Skip to content
Fort Lauderdale, FL · Licensed across FloridaMon–Fri 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM · (954) 807-3208
Romco Impact — Palm BeachCall

What we install · Glazing Into Existing Frames

Sometimes the Frame Stays and Only the Glass Changes

Where the existing frames are structurally sound and an approval exists for glazing into them, replacing only the glass is cheaper, faster and less disruptive than a full replacement.

Give us the address. In this county the address decides the pressure, the review, and often the price — before the window does.

Not HVHZ

Palm Beach uses statewide approval, not a Miami-Dade NOA

Still required

The county sits in the wind-borne debris region

Our crews

We measure, we schedule, and our own people install

Licensed

A licensed Florida general contractor

The option that is rarely mentioned because it is the smaller sale

Retrofit glazing genuinely does not suit every building, and the honest reason it is under-offered is not always technical. It is a smaller job. A full replacement is the larger sale, and a contractor with no reason to raise a cheaper alternative frequently does not raise it. Where the frames are sound and an approval exists, it is the right answer and it is worth asking any contractor directly why it has not been mentioned.

What has to be true for this to work

  • The existing frames are sound, square and properly anchored.
  • An approval exists for that glazing in that frame system.
  • The frame can take the thickness and weight of laminated glass.
  • The perimeter seal and drainage still function.
  • Corrosion has not compromised the anchoring.

Where it comes up most in this county

Palm Beach County has a large stock of mid-century and later apartment and low-rise condominium buildings, particularly through the coastal corridor. Many were built with aluminum frame systems that are still perfectly sound even though the glazing in them is original and unrated.

On those buildings retrofit is often the practical answer, and it has a second advantage: the exterior changes far less. Where an association or a municipal reviewer is resistant to a visible change across a whole elevation, glazing that leaves the frames in place is a much easier proposal to get approved.

How we handle it

  1. 01Inspect the frames honestly before proposing this at all.
  2. 02Confirm an approval covers the specific retrofit.
  3. 03Reglaze, reseal and confirm drainage still works.
  4. 04Say plainly where it does not apply rather than stretching it.

We inspect first and tell you which it is. On some buildings it applies across the whole elevation, on some across part of it, and on plenty it does not apply at all. A mixed answer is the most common one and it is perfectly workable — retrofit where the frames are good, replace where they are not.

Said plainly

Where we stop

This is not a cheaper route around bad frames. Where the frames are corroded, out of square or poorly anchored, retrofit glazing is not a lesser option, it is not an option, and we will not present it as one.

FAQ

Common questions

Is retrofit a compromise?
For protection, where the approval applies and the frames are sound, no. It is a different scope, not a lesser standard. Where the frames are not sound it is not a compromise either — it is simply the wrong solution.
Will it save much?
It varies by building, but it removes the frame, the anchoring, the stucco returns and the interior finishing from the job. That is a large share of the cost and most of the disruption.
Can it be mixed with full replacement?
Yes, and on a building that is not uniform that is usually the sensible plan. Applying one approach across a mixed building is how money gets wasted at one end and quality gets compromised at the other.

Next step

Find out what is actually wrong with it.

An inspection, photographs of what we found, and a written scope. If the honest answer is that it can wait another season, that is the answer you will get.